{"id":5759,"date":"2026-10-06T16:50:26","date_gmt":"2026-10-06T11:20:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/?p=5759"},"modified":"2026-10-06T16:50:28","modified_gmt":"2026-10-06T11:20:28","slug":"enterprise-ai-development-companies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/enterprise-ai-development-companies\/","title":{"rendered":"The 10 Best Enterprise AI Development Companies in 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Published: 5 October 2026 | Last updated: 5 October 2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"tldr-box\" style=\"background:#ddeeff;border-radius:16px;padding:28px 32px;max-width:820px;margin:0 0 32px 0;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,&apos;Segoe UI&apos;,sans-serif;color:#1a1a1a\"><div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;gap:8px;margin-bottom:20px;font-size:17px;line-height:1.4\"><span>\ud83d\udccb<\/span><span><span style=\"font-weight:700\">TL;DR<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight:400;font-style:italic\">powered by AI Actions<\/span><\/span><\/div><ul style=\"margin:0;padding-left:20px\"><li style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;margin:0 0 14px 0;color:#1a1a1a\"><strong>Binary Brill ranks first:<\/strong> senior in-house engineers ship integrated enterprise AI from $25\/hr, with a $5,000 minimum.<\/li><li style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;margin:0 0 14px 0;color:#1a1a1a\"><strong>Intellias for large programmes:<\/strong> a 1,000+ person team with a 4.9\/5 Clutch rating suits multi-year, multi-unit AI work.<\/li><li style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;margin:0 0 14px 0;color:#1a1a1a\"><strong>N-iX when data comes first:<\/strong> its biggest service line is big data, which matters when the warehouse blocks the AI.<\/li><li style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;margin:0 0 14px 0;color:#1a1a1a\"><strong>Integration decides enterprise AI success:<\/strong> most firms use AI, but few scale it, because permissions, data and security reviews stall pilots.<\/li><li style=\"font-size:16px;line-height:1.7;margin:0;color:#1a1a1a\"><strong>Ask six questions before signing:<\/strong> focus on production proof, evaluation, permissions, run costs, ownership and who does the work.<\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The best enterprise AI development companies in 2026 are the ones that can take an AI use case out of the pilot stage and run it safely inside systems a large organisation already depends on: the ERP, the CRM, the data warehouse and the approval chains around them. We reviewed more than 30 firms that sell enterprise AI development services and ranked the 10 that showed real production work, clear pricing and verified client reviews.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Binary Brill tops the list for mid-market companies and enterprise business units that want senior engineers and a fast first release. Intellias is the pick for large, multi-year AI programmes, N-iX is the strongest choice when the data platform is the real problem, and Leobit is the best value option for teams that still want deep review history.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here is what most enterprise AI lists miss: the model is rarely what fails. According to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/capabilities\/quantumblack\/our-insights\/the-state-of-ai\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">McKinsey&#8217;s State of AI 2025 survey<\/a>, 88% of organisations now use AI in at least one business function, yet most of them have not started scaling it across the enterprise. The gap is integration, data access, security review and ownership. That is what we scored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"at-a-glance\">Top 4 enterprise AI development companies at a glance<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you only have a minute, these are the four enterprise AI development companies we would shortlist first, and the situation each one fits best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th><\/th><th>Binary Brill<\/th><th>Intellias<\/th><th>N-iX<\/th><th>DataArt<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>Location<\/td><td>Mohali, India (clients in 15+ countries)<\/td><td>Krak\u00f3w, Poland<\/td><td>Malm\u00f6, Sweden<\/td><td>New York, NY<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Best for<\/td><td>Mid-market firms and enterprise business units that need AI shipped fast<\/td><td>Large, multi-year enterprise AI programmes<\/td><td>AI built on top of a big data and cloud platform<\/td><td>Regulated industries that need a long track record<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Starting rate<\/td><td>From $25\/hr<\/td><td>$50 to $99\/hr<\/td><td>$50 to $99\/hr<\/td><td>$50 to $99\/hr<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Score<\/td><td>9.4\/10<\/td><td>9.1\/10<\/td><td>9.0\/10<\/td><td>8.9\/10<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"how-we-scored\">How we scored these enterprise AI development companies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We scored every company on seven weighted criteria built around one question: can this team put an AI system into production inside a large organisation and keep it secure, accurate and owned by the client after launch?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We started with firms that list AI development as a core service on Clutch and on their own sites, plus the names AI assistants most often return when asked about enterprise AI vendors. We removed firms whose AI work we could only find in marketing copy and firms with too few verified reviews to judge. Every rate, minimum project size, team size and rating in this article comes from each company&#8217;s Clutch profile, checked on 5 October 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th>Criterion<\/th><th>Weight<\/th><th>What we looked for<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>Proven enterprise AI delivery<\/td><td>25%<\/td><td>AI systems running inside real business operations, not proofs of concept<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Integration and data engineering depth<\/td><td>20%<\/td><td>Connecting AI to ERP, CRM, data warehouses, identity systems and legacy software<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Security, governance and ownership<\/td><td>15%<\/td><td>Access control, audit trails, human review steps, clear IP terms<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Verified review depth<\/td><td>15%<\/td><td>Clutch rating weighted by the number of reviews<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Delivery process and communication<\/td><td>10%<\/td><td>Sprint cadence, demos, time-zone overlap, what reviewers say about responsiveness<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Pricing transparency<\/td><td>10%<\/td><td>Published rates, clear minimums, a path from estimate to fixed scope<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Engagement flexibility<\/td><td>5%<\/td><td>Pilot, fixed scope and dedicated team options without lock-in<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td><strong>Total<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>100%<\/strong><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Two things did not earn points on their own: headcount and logos. A firm with 10,000 staff and one Clutch review told us less than a 200-person firm with 60 detailed reviews from clients describing real builds. Large consultancies such as EPAM and SoftServe were left off for that reason: their Clutch profiles carry only a handful of reviews, so we could not score them on the same evidence as everyone else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Yes, we ranked ourselves first.<\/strong> Binary Brill publishes this list. We scored ourselves on the same criteria, and our entry tells you exactly when a large enterprise should hire someone else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"the-board\">The board: all 10 enterprise AI development companies, ranked<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The table below ranks all 10 enterprise AI development companies by overall score, with each firm&#8217;s best fit and starting price from Clutch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th>Rank<\/th><th>Company<\/th><th>Best for<\/th><th>Starting price<\/th><th>Score \/10<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>1<\/td><td><a href=\"#binary-brill\">Binary Brill<\/a><\/td><td>Mid-market firms and enterprise business units that need AI shipped fast<\/td><td>From $25\/hr, $5,000+ projects<\/td><td>9.4<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>2<\/td><td><a href=\"#intellias\">Intellias<\/a><\/td><td>Large, multi-year enterprise AI programmes<\/td><td>$50 to $99\/hr, $50,000+ projects<\/td><td>9.1<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>3<\/td><td><a href=\"#n-ix\">N-iX<\/a><\/td><td>AI on top of a big data and cloud platform<\/td><td>$50 to $99\/hr, $100,000+ projects<\/td><td>9.0<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>4<\/td><td><a href=\"#dataart\">DataArt<\/a><\/td><td>Regulated industries that need a long track record<\/td><td>$50 to $99\/hr, $100,000+ projects<\/td><td>8.9<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>5<\/td><td><a href=\"#sciencesoft\">ScienceSoft<\/a><\/td><td>AI-focused delivery with a US headquarters<\/td><td>$50 to $99\/hr, $5,000+ projects<\/td><td>8.8<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>6<\/td><td><a href=\"#innowise\">Innowise<\/a><\/td><td>Compliance-heavy AI in healthcare and finance<\/td><td>$50 to $99\/hr, $10,000+ projects<\/td><td>8.7<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>7<\/td><td><a href=\"#leobit\">Leobit<\/a><\/td><td>Best value with deep review history<\/td><td>$25 to $49\/hr, $25,000+ projects<\/td><td>8.6<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>8<\/td><td><a href=\"#fingent\">Fingent<\/a><\/td><td>AI added to custom enterprise software<\/td><td>$25 to $49\/hr, $25,000+ projects<\/td><td>8.5<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>9<\/td><td><a href=\"#indata-labs\">InData Labs<\/a><\/td><td>Specialist machine learning and NLP teams<\/td><td>$50 to $99\/hr, $10,000+ projects<\/td><td>8.4<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>10<\/td><td><a href=\"#10pearls\">10Pearls<\/a><\/td><td>Enterprise digital products with AI features<\/td><td>$25 to $49\/hr, $50,000+ projects<\/td><td>8.3<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you are comparing vendors with offices in one market, our separate ranking of the <a href=\"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/ai-development-companies-usa\/\">best AI development companies in the USA<\/a> covers broader AI and machine learning firms with US teams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"full-breakdown\">The full breakdown<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Each entry covers quick facts, how the company works, its core enterprise AI services, one piece of proof and one honest tradeoff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"binary-brill\">1. Binary Brill<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Score: 9.4\/10 | Best for:<\/strong> mid-market companies and enterprise business units that want an AI system wired into their existing software by senior in-house engineers, with full IP ownership, at offshore rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Pricing:<\/strong> from $25\/hr. One call gives you a likely cost range; a short paid discovery fixes scope and price.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Founded:<\/strong> 2023<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Team size:<\/strong> 45+ in-house engineers, no subcontracting<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Location:<\/strong> Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar (Mohali), Punjab, India, with clients in 15+ countries and working-hour overlap<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Rating:<\/strong> 4.8\/5 on Google Business Profile<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Minimum project size:<\/strong> $5,000<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Key clients:<\/strong> Science and Mind, OrbiSim, Jim&#8217;s Group, Prime Selection<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Core services:<\/strong> AI and ML development, RAG pipelines, agentic AI systems, AI process automation, enterprise integrations, custom ERP and CRM work<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We build enterprise AI for the part of the organisation where most AI projects stall: the gap between a working pilot and a system that staff use every day. A model that answers questions in a demo is one thing. A model that reads from your ERP, respects who is allowed to see which record, writes back to your CRM, logs every action and passes a security review is another. That second job is what we are hired for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Every line of code is written by our own engineers in Mohali. We do not subcontract, and the people who demo each sprint are the people who wrote the code. Work runs in two-week sprints with a working demo at the end of each one, so a business sponsor sees progress every fortnight rather than at the end of a quarter. You own the repository, prompts, evaluation sets and deployment pipeline from day one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We are deliberately not a 10,000-person consultancy. Our clients are usually mid-market companies, or a single division inside a larger group, that need a focused AI system built and integrated without a six-month procurement cycle and a seven-figure statement of work. Our <a href=\"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/services\/ai-ml-development\/\">AI and ML development team<\/a> sits next to our ERP, CRM and integration engineers, so one team ships the AI feature and the plumbing it depends on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How we&#8217;re different from the others on this list<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>The lowest entry point for serious enterprise work.<\/strong> Rates start at $25\/hr and projects at $5,000. Most firms on this list start at $25,000 to $100,000, which makes a scoped pilot hard to approve.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Integration is the core skill, not an add-on.<\/strong> Our <a href=\"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/services\/enterprise-integrations\/\">enterprise integrations<\/a> work connects AI to ERP, CRM, data stores and internal tools, with the permissions those systems already enforce.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Senior engineers from the first email.<\/strong> A senior engineer replies within one business day, and the first call is a working session on scope and data, not a sales pitch.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Evaluation before tuning.<\/strong> We build a test set from your real cases and agree a pass mark with you before we tune anything. The system ships when it clears that bar.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>No lock-in.<\/strong> Code, prompts, models and pipelines are yours. If you bring the work in-house later, nothing in our contract stops you.<\/li>\n\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The problems we&#8217;re hired to fix<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th>Problem<\/th><th>Usual cause<\/th><th>Our fix<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>The AI pilot never reaches production<\/td><td>No agreed definition of &#8220;good enough&#8221;, so nobody signs off<\/td><td>An evaluation set from real examples and a pass mark agreed before build<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>The assistant gives confident wrong answers about internal policy or data<\/td><td>The model cannot see the right documents, or sees documents the user should not<\/td><td>A permission-aware <a href=\"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/services\/rag-pipeline-development\/\">RAG pipeline<\/a> over your documents, with citations and an &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8221; fallback<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Staff still re-key data between systems<\/td><td>The AI sits in a separate chat window instead of inside the workflow<\/td><td>Integration into the ERP, CRM or internal app, with agents that act within set limits and log every step<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Security review blocks the launch<\/td><td>Access, logging and data handling were not designed in from the start<\/td><td>Role-based access, audit logs and human approval steps built into the first sprint<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Mini case studies<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>AI automation for an operations team.<\/strong> The client&#8217;s staff spent hours each day on repetitive manual processing. We built an AI automation that handles the routine cases and passes exceptions to a person for review. It now saves the team 5 hours of manual work every day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Science and Mind (life sciences marketplace).<\/strong> Science and Mind connects research teams with experts, lab services and research databases in one platform. We built expert matching, research database search and secure payments: the search, matching and transaction layer that enterprise AI features depend on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Jim&#8217;s Group (Australian franchise network).<\/strong> Jim&#8217;s Group runs a large franchise network in Australia. We worked on its digital presence across that network, the kind of multi-site, many-stakeholder environment where enterprise AI has to fit around existing processes rather than replace them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">More work, including eVera, OrbiSim, NIC Paints, Prime Selection and Beat22, is in our <a href=\"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/portfolio\/\">project portfolio<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Pricing summary<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rates start from $25\/hr with a $5,000 minimum project size. One call gives you a likely cost range, and a short paid discovery turns it into a fixed scope, price and timeline. Our <a href=\"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/pricing\/\">pricing page<\/a> explains the engagement models, and our guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/ai-development-cost\/\">AI development cost<\/a> breaks down build, run and upkeep budgets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When to pick someone else<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>You are planning a multi-year, multi-country AI programme with dozens of engineers:<\/strong> pick Intellias, which runs large programmes for enterprise clients and has more than 1,000 staff.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Your real problem is the data warehouse, not the model:<\/strong> pick N-iX, whose biggest service line on Clutch is BI and big data.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Procurement requires decades of history and named enterprise clients:<\/strong> pick DataArt, founded in 1997, with clients such as Priceline and Ocado Technology.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>You need formal ISO, SOC 2 and HIPAA credentials listed up front:<\/strong> pick Innowise, which publishes those certifications and compliance claims on its profile.<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Tradeoff: at 45+ engineers we are smaller than every other firm on this list, so a programme that needs 50 people on day one is the wrong fit for us.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"intellias\">2. Intellias<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Score: 9.1\/10 | Best for:<\/strong> large enterprises running multi-year AI and digital programmes across several business units.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Pricing:<\/strong> $50 to $99\/hr<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Founded:<\/strong> 2002<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Team size:<\/strong> 1,000 to 9,999 employees<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Location:<\/strong> Krak\u00f3w, Poland<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Clutch rating:<\/strong> 4.9\/5 from 30 reviews<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Minimum project size:<\/strong> $50,000<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Core services:<\/strong> custom software, generative AI, AI consulting, AI development, big data, cybersecurity, IoT<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Intellias is built for enterprise scale. On Clutch, half of its clients are enterprises with more than $1 billion in revenue and the other half are midmarket companies, which is the most enterprise-heavy client mix of any firm on this list that also has a solid review count. Its industries include financial services, mobility, legal research, healthcare and retail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The firm&#8217;s service mix explains its ranking. Generative AI, AI consulting and AI development together make up 35% of its Clutch service focus, and that sits alongside cybersecurity, managed IT and big data. For an enterprise, that matters: the team that builds the AI model can also handle the security review, the data platform and the long-term support contract.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Intellias tends to work in long engagements rather than one-off builds. Several reviews describe relationships that run for years and cover many projects, with the vendor contributing enterprise architecture and planning as well as engineering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key services:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li>Generative AI solutions and AI consulting<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Machine learning development embedded in SaaS and enterprise platforms<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Big data and BI consulting<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Cybersecurity and managed IT services<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Enterprise architecture and digital transformation planning<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Proof:<\/strong> a pan-European fintech company describes a \u20ac3M+ engagement covering IT engineering, strategic planning and enterprise architecture across 15 projects. Another client says Intellias embedded AI algorithms into a scalable SaaS platform for 3D point cloud analysis and delivered &#8220;a very user friendly and stable tool&#8221; despite a technically challenging brief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Tradeoff: the $50,000 minimum and programme-style engagements make Intellias a poor fit for a single, tightly scoped AI pilot.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"n-ix\">3. N-iX<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Score: 9.0\/10 | Best for:<\/strong> enterprises whose AI ambitions depend on fixing or migrating the data platform first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Pricing:<\/strong> $50 to $99\/hr<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Founded:<\/strong> 2002<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Team size:<\/strong> 1,000 to 9,999 employees<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Location:<\/strong> Malm\u00f6, Sweden<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Clutch rating:<\/strong> 4.8\/5 from 35 reviews<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Minimum project size:<\/strong> $100,000<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Key clients:<\/strong> Bosch, Siemens, AutoScout24, Lebara<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Core services:<\/strong> BI and big data consulting, AI development, custom software, cloud consulting, staff augmentation<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">N-iX is the data-first choice on this list. BI and big data consulting is its largest Clutch service line at 36%, with AI development close behind at 31%. That combination fits a common enterprise reality: the AI project cannot start until the data it needs is clean, governed and sitting somewhere a model can reach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Within AI, the firm&#8217;s Clutch profile lists machine learning, computer vision and recommendation systems as its main areas. Its named clients, including Bosch and Siemens, point to long experience with industrial and engineering-heavy enterprises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">N-iX also staffs large teams. Reviews describe engagements with 15 or more engineers across data engineering and QA, which suits enterprises that want one vendor to carry a big migration and the AI work that follows it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key services:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li>Data warehouse and data platform migration<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Machine learning and computer vision<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Recommendation systems<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Cloud consulting and system integration<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Dedicated teams and staff augmentation<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Proof:<\/strong> for Rackspace Technology, N-iX supported the migration of a SQL Server data warehouse to Google Cloud Platform, handling data ingestion from around 100 internal sources with a team of 15+ people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Tradeoff: the $100,000 minimum project size is the joint highest on this list, so smaller AI use cases will not clear the bar.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"dataart\">4. DataArt<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Score: 8.9\/10 | Best for:<\/strong> regulated enterprises in finance, travel and healthcare that want a vendor with a long track record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Pricing:<\/strong> $50 to $99\/hr<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Founded:<\/strong> 1997<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Team size:<\/strong> 1,000 to 9,999 employees<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Location:<\/strong> New York, NY<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Clutch rating:<\/strong> 4.9\/5 from 26 reviews<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Minimum project size:<\/strong> $100,000<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Key clients:<\/strong> Priceline, Ocado Technology, Legal &amp; General, Flutter Entertainment<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Core services:<\/strong> custom software, AI development, IoT, big data, cloud, ecommerce<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">DataArt has nearly three decades of delivery behind it, and its client list reads like an enterprise procurement shortlist. For buyers who need to justify a vendor to a risk committee, that history counts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">AI development is 15% of DataArt&#8217;s Clutch service focus, alongside custom software, IoT and big data. The firm positions its AI work around a structured operating model for regulated industries, which matches its strengths in financial services and healthcare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Reviews consistently praise quality and reliability, and the firm is used to working inside the process requirements large clients bring: security reviews, vendor audits and formal change control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key services:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li>AI development and AI-enabled delivery for regulated industries<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Search relevance and data engineering<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Cloud and big data consulting<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Custom enterprise software and ecommerce platforms<\/li>\n\n\n<li>IoT development<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Proof:<\/strong> for Rappi, DataArt improved search relevance with an Elasticsearch implementation that cut user drop-off from 25% to 5%. DataArt also states that its AI-enabled operating model delivers up to 70% faster prototyping in defined use cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Tradeoff: with a $100,000 minimum and a broad service mix, DataArt is less suited to a fast, narrow AI experiment.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"sciencesoft\">5. ScienceSoft<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Score: 8.8\/10 | Best for:<\/strong> enterprises that want an AI-focused vendor with a US headquarters and a low entry point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Pricing:<\/strong> $50 to $99\/hr<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Founded:<\/strong> 1989<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Team size:<\/strong> 250 to 999 employees<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Location:<\/strong> McKinney, TX<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Clutch rating:<\/strong> 4.8\/5 from 43 reviews<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Minimum project size:<\/strong> $5,000<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Key clients:<\/strong> Advisors Asset Management, Miami Dade College, South Ayrshire Council<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Core services:<\/strong> AI development, AI agents, AI consulting, generative AI, custom software, managed IT<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">ScienceSoft is the most AI-focused company on this list by service mix. AI development alone accounts for 60% of its Clutch profile, and AI agents, AI consulting and generative AI add another 30%. It has also been in business since 1989, longer than any other firm here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That combination of focus and history is rare. Many long-established IT firms list AI as a small slice of a broad catalogue. ScienceSoft has reshaped its service mix around AI while keeping the delivery habits of an older firm, and reviewers mention timeliness more than any other quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Its client list mixes private companies with public bodies such as a US college and a UK council, which suggests comfort with public-sector procurement and data rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key services:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li>Custom AI and machine learning development<\/li>\n\n\n<li>AI agents and generative AI<\/li>\n\n\n<li>AI consulting and strategy<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Web and mobile platforms that host AI features<\/li>\n\n\n<li>IT managed services<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Proof:<\/strong> an AI vision company used ScienceSoft for a roughly $200,000 build of a ReactJS and NodeJS portal on AWS, and credited the team&#8217;s rapid scaling capacity for handling both planned and unplanned needs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Tradeoff: the named review examples are more about the platforms around AI than about large AI systems in production, so ask for enterprise AI references directly.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"innowise\">6. Innowise<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Score: 8.7\/10 | Best for:<\/strong> enterprises in healthcare, finance and insurance that need compliance credentials on paper before work starts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Pricing:<\/strong> $50 to $99\/hr<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Founded:<\/strong> 2007<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Team size:<\/strong> 1,000 to 9,999 employees<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Location:<\/strong> Warsaw, Poland, with 13 offices across Europe, Australia and New Zealand<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Clutch rating:<\/strong> 4.9\/5 from 73 reviews<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Minimum project size:<\/strong> $10,000<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Core services:<\/strong> custom software, staff augmentation, AI development, cloud, mobile, cybersecurity<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Innowise has the deepest review history on this list, with 73 Clutch reviews at 4.9\/5. It also lists ISO 9001, 13485, 27001, 27017 and 27018 certifications and SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS and GDPR compliance on its profile, plus partnerships with AWS, Microsoft, SAP, Databricks and UiPath.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For an enterprise security team, that list shortens vendor onboarding. For the AI work itself, Innowise is a generalist: AI development is one of several equal service lines, so expect AI to be delivered by a broad engineering firm rather than a specialist lab.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key services:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li>Predictive models and analytics dashboards<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Healthcare and insurance data platforms<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Cloud, DevOps and MLOps support<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Staff augmentation for in-house AI teams<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Cybersecurity<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Proof:<\/strong> for a pharmaceutical client, Innowise delivered predictive models and dashboards that cut clinical trial data processing time by 27%. A healthcare client says the team &#8220;cut down on manual processes&#8221; and integrated cleanly with insurance systems while handling sensitive patient data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Tradeoff: AI is one of many equal service lines, so specialist AI depth varies by team; ask who exactly will staff your project.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"leobit\">7. Leobit<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Score: 8.6\/10 | Best for:<\/strong> enterprises that want strong value and a perfect review record for AI automation and modernisation work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Pricing:<\/strong> $25 to $49\/hr<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Founded:<\/strong> 2014<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Team size:<\/strong> 50 to 249 employees<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Location:<\/strong> Lviv, Ukraine<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Clutch rating:<\/strong> 5.0\/5 from 61 reviews<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Minimum project size:<\/strong> $25,000<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Key clients:<\/strong> Applied Computer Technologies, Asprey Management Solutions, The School of Life<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Core services:<\/strong> AI development, AI agents, generative AI, custom software, cloud, enterprise app modernisation<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Leobit pairs a perfect 5.0 rating across 61 Clutch reviews with rates in the $25 to $49 band. AI development, AI agents and generative AI make up 40% of its service focus, and enterprise app modernisation adds another 10%, which is a useful mix for organisations that need AI added to older software.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The team is mid-sized, so it suits enterprises that want a focused squad rather than a large programme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key services:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li>AI agents and document automation<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Generative AI features in existing products<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Enterprise application modernisation<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Cloud consulting<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Web and mobile development<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Proof:<\/strong> for Applied Computer Technologies, Leobit built an AI bot that generates SOWs, NDAs and agreements, reducing document creation time &#8220;from several hours to just a few minutes.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Tradeoff: with 50 to 249 staff, Leobit cannot staff very large programmes as quickly as the 1,000+ firms above it.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"fingent\">8. Fingent<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Score: 8.5\/10 | Best for:<\/strong> enterprises that want AI added to custom business software by a US-headquartered firm with offshore rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Pricing:<\/strong> $25 to $49\/hr<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Founded:<\/strong> 2003<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Team size:<\/strong> 250 to 999 employees<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Location:<\/strong> White Plains, NY<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Clutch rating:<\/strong> 4.9\/5 from 66 reviews<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Minimum project size:<\/strong> $25,000<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Key clients:<\/strong> Mastercard, Sony, PwC, NEC, SS&amp;C Technologies<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Core services:<\/strong> custom software, AI development, mobile and web development<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fingent&#8217;s client list includes Mastercard, Sony and PwC, and its 66 Clutch reviews average 4.9\/5. Custom software is half of its service focus and AI development is 30%, so its AI work usually lives inside bespoke enterprise applications rather than as standalone models.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key services:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li>AI development for business applications<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Custom enterprise software<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Legacy app migration<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Mobile and web development<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Proof:<\/strong> for SS&amp;C Technologies, Fingent migrated legacy mobile apps to React Native and built new financial product apps that won first-submission approval on both the App Store and Google Play.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Tradeoff: the most detailed public proof is software and mobile delivery rather than AI, so request AI-specific case studies before you shortlist.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"indata-labs\">9. InData Labs<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Score: 8.4\/10 | Best for:<\/strong> enterprises that need a specialist machine learning and NLP team rather than a full-service firm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Pricing:<\/strong> $50 to $99\/hr<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Founded:<\/strong> 2014<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Team size:<\/strong> 50 to 249 employees<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Location:<\/strong> Vilnius, Lithuania<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Clutch rating:<\/strong> 4.9\/5 from 20 reviews<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Minimum project size:<\/strong> $10,000<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Core services:<\/strong> AI development, big data, generative AI, AI consulting<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">InData Labs is a pure AI and data shop. AI development, generative AI and AI consulting make up 75% of its Clutch service focus, and machine learning and natural language processing are its two largest AI specialties. Reviewers often describe the team as working like part of their own staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key services:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li>Machine learning and predictive models<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Natural language processing<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Chatbots and conversational AI<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Big data consulting<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Proof:<\/strong> a manufacturing company used InData Labs for predictive forecasting, with the team strengthening models and feature engineering while staying on budget and meeting deadlines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Tradeoff: only 10% of its clients are $1 billion+ enterprises, and it does less of the surrounding app and ERP integration work.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"10pearls\">10. 10Pearls<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Score: 8.3\/10 | Best for:<\/strong> enterprises building digital products that need AI features alongside mobile, cloud and DevOps work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Pricing:<\/strong> $25 to $49\/hr<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Founded:<\/strong> 2004<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Team size:<\/strong> 1,000 to 9,999 employees<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Location:<\/strong> Vienna, VA<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Clutch rating:<\/strong> 4.9\/5 from 36 reviews<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Minimum project size:<\/strong> $50,000<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Core services:<\/strong> custom software, AI development, mobile, cloud, DevOps<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">10Pearls serves a client base that is 45% enterprise and 45% midmarket on Clutch. AI development is 20% of its service focus, spread evenly across computer vision, machine learning and natural language processing, and it sits beside mobile, cloud and DevOps capabilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key services:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li>Computer vision, machine learning and NLP<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Enterprise digital product development<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Cloud consulting and DevOps<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Mobile app development<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Proof:<\/strong> an educational healthcare company engaged 10Pearls to update its system architecture and build core features, rating the team 5.0 for quality, schedule and willingness to refer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Tradeoff: the public review detail is mostly about product engineering, so AI depth is harder to verify than at the specialists above.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"how-to-choose\">How to choose an enterprise AI development company: 6 questions to ask before you sign<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The fastest way to compare enterprise AI development companies is to ask the same six questions and listen for specific answers. For a broader vendor checklist, see our list of <a href=\"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/things-to-check-before-hiring-an-ai-development-company\/\">things to check before hiring an AI development company<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Which of your AI systems are running in production today, and for how long?<\/strong> A good answer names the system, the users and how long it has been live. Pilots and internal demos do not count.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>How will you measure whether the system is good enough to launch?<\/strong> Look for an evaluation set built from your real cases and a pass mark agreed before build. &#8220;We will test it thoroughly&#8221; is not an answer.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>How does the AI respect our existing permissions?<\/strong> The vendor should explain how user roles from your identity provider, ERP or document store carry through to what the model can see and do.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>What will each request or workflow cost us to run?<\/strong> Ask for a cost-per-request or cost-per-month estimate at your expected volume, and how they plan to control it with caching, routing or smaller models.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Who owns the code, prompts, data pipelines and any trained models?<\/strong> The only good answer is &#8220;you do, from day one&#8221;, written into the contract.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Who exactly will work on our project?<\/strong> Ask for the names and seniority of the engineers, whether any work is subcontracted, and how often you will see a working demo.<\/li>\n\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"faqs\">FAQs<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Who is the best enterprise AI development company?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Binary Brill ranks first on our list for mid-market companies and enterprise business units, thanks to senior in-house engineers, deep integration work and a $5,000 entry point. For very large, multi-year programmes, Intellias and N-iX are stronger fits because of their scale and data platform depth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How much does enterprise AI development cost?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Hourly rates on this list run from $25 to $99 per hour, and minimum projects range from $5,000 to $100,000. A focused AI pilot integrated with one system usually sits at the low end; an AI programme spanning several departments and data sources sits far higher. Ongoing model, hosting and maintenance costs come on top of the build.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How long does an enterprise AI project take?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A scoped pilot that connects to one or two systems can usually reach users within a few months. Larger programmes that need data platform work, security reviews and change management across departments take considerably longer. Two-week sprints with demos make progress visible either way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Should we hire an AI specialist or a full-stack software company?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Hire a specialist when the hard part is the model itself, such as a novel computer vision or forecasting problem. Hire a full-stack firm when the hard part is integration: getting AI to read from and write to your ERP, CRM and internal tools. Most enterprise projects are integration problems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Is it better to build enterprise AI in-house or outsource it?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Outsourcing makes sense for the first production systems, when you need experienced engineers quickly and do not yet know what a permanent AI team should look like. Choose a vendor that hands over code, prompts and pipelines so you can bring the work in-house later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How was this list ranked?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We scored each company on seven weighted criteria: enterprise AI delivery, integration depth, security and ownership, review depth, delivery process, pricing transparency and engagement flexibility. All company data comes from Clutch profiles checked on 5 October 2026. Binary Brill publishes this list and scored itself on the same criteria.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"next-step\">Next step: get a cost range for your enterprise AI project<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Book a call with a senior Binary Brill engineer and leave with a realistic cost range and a plan for your first production release.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li>A review of the use case, the systems it touches and the data it needs<\/li>\n\n\n<li>A likely cost range and timeline for a first release<\/li>\n\n\n<li>The security and permission questions to settle before build<\/li>\n\n\n<li>Whether a pilot, fixed scope or dedicated team fits best<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/contact-us\/\"><strong>Book your consultation call<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We ranked the 10 best enterprise AI development companies on production delivery, integration depth, security, reviews and pricing, with honest tradeoffs for each.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5760,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5759","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5759","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5759"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5759\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5761,"href":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5759\/revisions\/5761"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5760"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5759"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5759"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/binarybrill.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5759"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}