The iOS app development company that refuses the lowest common denominator

Usually yes, where the iPhone segment is the one that matters commercially. A native build lets you go deep on the platform your highest-value users are actually on, rather than building a compromise that serves neither well. Whether that's the right call for your specific split is worth a short conversation before you commit either way.

Screen count matters less than people expect. The expensive parts are offline behaviour, real-time features, payment and subscription flows through StoreKit, and any platform-only capability like a Watch companion or Live Activities. Supporting older iOS versions adds testing time rather than build time. After a shaping conversation we can give you a range, and a short paid discovery converts that into a fixed scope and timeline.

We build the privacy nutrition label from what the code actually collects rather than a template, implement App Tracking Transparency prompts correctly, and give users a working account deletion path from inside the app — all three are common, avoidable rejection reasons. Your data and your users' data stay in your own infrastructure and accounts; we don't route it through anything of ours.

When your budget is tight, you need both platforms fast, and the app doesn't touch the hardware in ways that need Apple-specific frameworks — in that case a single cross-platform codebase gets you to both stores for less. Native also isn't the answer if you need the app to behave identically on iOS and Android, since native leans into each platform's own conventions by design rather than flattening the difference.

Yes — we start with a review of the codebase, the build setup and the App Review history before touching any features, so you know what state the project is actually in. From there we can migrate legacy Objective-C or UIKit code to Swift and SwiftUI incrementally, rather than a stop-the-world rewrite that puts feature work on hold for months.

Yes, where it's part of the scope. iPad support done properly means multi-window layouts and pointer interactions, not an iPhone screen stretched to fill more space — we scope it as its own decision during the capability audit rather than assuming it's free.

You do, from the first commit: repository, designs, signing certificates and the App Store listing. We publish under your own Apple Developer account rather than ours, because moving a live app out of an agency account later is genuinely painful and risks your reviews and rankings. If the account doesn't exist yet, we help you set it up before submission.

Our own in-house engineers in Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab — 45+ of them, with over a decade of combined delivery experience, delivering for clients in 15+ countries. Nothing is subcontracted. You meet the engineers who will be on your project before you sign, and the person demonstrating the work each sprint is the person who built it.