HOME/WEB DEVELOPMENT

Web Development

Engineers who know each stack well enough to tell you its weaknesses

React, Next.js, Angular, Node.js, .NET and Laravel — we work in all of them daily, which is why we can say honestly when one is the right choice and when it is inherited baggage you should plan to leave. Whichever stack you land on, you get engineers who have maintained code in it for years, not just started projects.

Book a free consultation See our work

A senior engineer replies within 24 hours — not a sales rep.

The stack problems that slow teams down

The framework moved on and the codebase did not

AngularJS applications still running years after end of life. Next.js projects stuck before the App Router. .NET Framework code that cannot leave Windows Server. Each upgrade got deferred for a good reason at the time, and the deferrals compounded — now the jump is large enough that it needs its own project, and every month of delay makes it larger.

You cannot hire for what you are running

The stack made sense when one senior developer chose it. Now that person has left, the job ads get no qualified applicants, and the agencies quoting for the work are all pitching a rewrite because none of them want to touch it either. The technical problem is manageable; the staffing problem is what actually threatens the product.

Rendering decisions made once and never revisited

Everything is client-rendered because that was the default when the project started, so the marketing pages are invisible to search engines and the first paint waits on three API calls. Or the reverse: everything is server-rendered including an interactive dashboard that now hammers the origin on every interaction. Nobody wrote down why, so nobody feels safe changing it.

Two teams, two conventions, one repository

The backend engineers structure things one way and the people who joined later structure them another. There is no agreed pattern for validation, error handling or where business logic lives, so every code review reopens the same argument and every new starter learns the codebase by archaeology rather than by reading a convention document.

How we work at the framework level

Frameworks are commitments, not preferences — you will hire against this decision, upgrade against it, and live with its idioms for years. We treat stack selection and stack rescue as first-class engineering work rather than something settled in a kickoff call.

Stack chosen against your hiring market, not our comfort

The best framework for your product is one you can still staff in three years, in the places you recruit. We weigh that alongside the technical fit and we will recommend keeping a stack we would not have picked ourselves when your team already knows it well. Switching frameworks is only worth the disruption when the current one is actively blocking you.

Incremental migration wherever a rewrite can be avoided

A legacy Angular or PHP application can usually be modernised route by route, with new work built in the target stack behind the same domain while the old application keeps serving everything else. It takes longer than a rewrite on paper and it removes the risk that actually kills these projects — a cutover weekend where the new system meets real data for the first time.

Conventions written down before the second developer joins

One agreed structure for modules, validation, error handling and testing, documented and enforced through linting and code review. This is what makes a codebase survivable when the original authors leave, and it costs almost nothing to establish at the start compared to retrofitting it across forty thousand lines.

Upgrade paths kept open on purpose

We stay close to framework defaults, keep dependencies current as routine work rather than as a project, and avoid clever abstractions that make the next major version painful. Most of the horror stories in this section started as a small deviation from the framework's intended way of doing something.

What this covers

Pick the piece you need, or bring us the problem and we'll tell you which applies.

React & Next.js Development

React for interfaces with real interactive complexity, Next.js when public pages need to be fast and indexable alongside an authenticated area. The common failure here is not React itself — it is a data-fetching and state approach chosen ad hoc, which is what turns a six-month-old codebase into a re-render debugging exercise.

App Router work: server components, streaming, and a deliberate split between static, server-rendered and client-rendered routes
State and data handled with one agreed approach — TanStack Query or Redux Toolkit — rather than three coexisting patterns
Performance budgets on bundle size and interaction latency enforced in CI, with Core Web Vitals tracked from real users
Component libraries built on accessible primitives so keyboard and screen reader support is inherited, not retrofitted

Angular Development

Angular earns its place on large internal platforms with many screens and several engineers, where its opinionated structure prevents the divergence that hurts less prescriptive frameworks. We also do a lot of AngularJS rescue work, which is a different job entirely and should not be quoted as if it were an upgrade.

Modern Angular builds using standalone components, signals and typed reactive forms
AngularJS and early-version migrations run incrementally, with old and new running side by side rather than a single cutover
NgRx introduced only where shared state genuinely warrants it, not applied across the whole application by default
Lazy-loaded feature modules and change detection tuning to keep large screen counts responsive

Node.js & Backend Development

Node.js suits workloads that are heavy on concurrent I/O — APIs, real-time features, integration layers, job pipelines — and lets a TypeScript team share types and tooling across the whole stack. It is a poor fit for CPU-bound work, and we will say so rather than build you something that stalls the event loop under load.

REST and GraphQL APIs in NestJS or Express, with schemas published so other teams integrate from documentation
Real-time features over WebSockets, with reconnection and presence handled properly rather than assumed
Background jobs and queues on BullMQ, RabbitMQ or SQS, including retries, idempotency and dead-letter handling
Structured logging, tracing and health checks wired in from the first deployment, not after the first outage

.NET Development

ASP.NET Core is a strong choice for systems that need to be correct, auditable and supported for a long time — which is why it dominates finance, insurance and enterprise back offices. Much of our .NET work is moving organisations off .NET Framework and onto something that runs in Linux containers and still gets security updates.

.NET Framework to modern .NET migrations, including the Windows-only dependencies that usually block them
ASP.NET Core APIs and services with Entity Framework Core, typed contracts and integration tests
Azure AD and identity integration, role and claims-based authorisation enforced at the API boundary
Containerised deployment on Linux, ending the licensing and hosting constraints of the legacy stack

Laravel & PHP Development

Laravel remains one of the fastest routes from requirement to a working, maintainable application, and modern PHP is a long way from its reputation. Most of what we see is the older half: PHP 7 or earlier, custom framework code, no tests, and a hosting arrangement nobody wants to touch.

Laravel applications with queues, scheduling, Eloquent models and Blade or Livewire interfaces
Legacy PHP modernisation: version upgrades, moving custom code onto a framework, and adding a test suite before changing behaviour
WordPress and WooCommerce work where a content platform is the right tool rather than a bespoke build
API layers exposing an existing PHP system to a mobile app or partner without rewriting the core

The stack we build on

Chosen to fit the problem — not because it's what we used last time.

JavaScript & TypeScript

React
Next.js
Angular
TypeScript
Node.js
NestJS
Express

.NET & PHP

ASP.NET Core
C#
Entity Framework Core
Blazor
Laravel
PHP 8
Livewire

Data & messaging

PostgreSQL
MySQL
SQL Server
MongoDB
Redis
RabbitMQ
Elasticsearch

Build, test & deploy

Vite
Docker
GitHub Actions
Playwright
Jest & xUnit
PHPUnit
Sentry

How we'll work together

Every stage ends with something in your hands — not a status update.

01
Stack assessment
Whether you are starting fresh or inheriting something, we begin the same way: what the application has to do, what your team can maintain, where the current code is genuinely holding you back, and which parts are merely unfashionable rather than broken.
You get: A written stack recommendation with the alternatives and their trade-offs, plus a risk list on any existing codebase we reviewed.
02
Reference implementation and conventions
We build one vertical slice end to end — a real feature, through the UI, the API, the data layer and the tests — and use it to settle the patterns everything else will follow. Arguments about structure are much cheaper here than in month four.
You get: A working reference feature in your repository, a documented conventions guide, and a CI pipeline enforcing them.
03
Build, or migrate route by route
New builds proceed in two-week sprints against a staging environment. Migrations run alongside the live system, moving one area at a time with traffic routed per path, so users cross over gradually and you can pause the programme without leaving anything half-finished.
You get: Working software on a staging URL every sprint, with migrated areas released to production as they complete.
04
Currency plan and handover
Before we step back, we set out how the stack stays current: which versions are supported until when, what upgrades fall due, and what the routine looks like. Then we work through it with your engineers rather than emailing a document.
You get: A dependency and framework upgrade calendar, technical documentation, and working handover sessions with your team.

Where we've applied this

Finance

Portals and back-office systems where .NET's tooling around auditing, typed contracts and long-term support maps well onto regulated change control.

Retail & e-commerce

Storefronts built in Next.js where search visibility and first-paint speed on a phone are the difference between a session and a bounce.

Healthcare

Clinician and patient applications with heavy forms and strict role rules, where Angular's structure keeps a large screen count coherent across a big team.

Logistics

Tracking and dispatch systems where Node.js handles many concurrent connections and event streams from carrier and telematics feeds.

Professional services

Client portals and operational tools where Laravel gets a working system in front of users quickly without leaving an unmaintainable codebase behind.

Education

Learning platforms combining public course pages that must rank with an authenticated area that has to stay responsive during enrolment peaks.

Clients we've built for

Real products, in production, with real users on them.

Lush

Science and Mind

Beat22

Sagor

Questions buyers ask us

How do you decide which stack a project should use?

Three inputs, roughly equal. What the product does — public search visibility, real-time behaviour and heavy computation all push in different directions. What your team already runs, because a stack your engineers can review is worth more than a marginally better one they cannot. And what you can hire for in your market. We write the recommendation down with the rejected options and why, so you can disagree with the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.

Should we upgrade our legacy application or rewrite it?

Upgrade far more often than the pitch decks suggest. A rewrite throws away years of encoded business rules that exist nowhere else, and the replacement typically spends its first year rediscovering them through bug reports. We recommend rewriting when the framework has no supported upgrade path at all, or when the architecture blocks something the business needs now. Otherwise incremental modernisation gets you there with the lights on.

What drives the cost of a web development project?

The number of distinct user roles and workflows, integrations with systems you do not control, and the state of any existing code we have to work within. Framework choice barely moves the figure — a Laravel build and a .NET build of the same scope land close together. What does move it is unclear requirements, because ambiguity converts into rework. A short paid discovery turns an estimate into a fixed scope and price.

Can you work inside our existing codebase and alongside our engineers?

Yes, and it is common. We start by reading the code and matching your conventions rather than importing ours, submit pull requests your team reviews, and keep to your branching and release process. Where conventions are absent or contradictory we will propose a set, but that is a conversation with your engineers rather than something we impose on the first commit.

Who writes the code, and how experienced are they?

Our own in-house engineers in Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Punjab — 45+ of them, with over a decade of combined delivery experience. Nothing is subcontracted. You meet the engineers who will be on your project before you sign, and the person demonstrating the sprint is the person who wrote it.

What stops us being locked into you afterwards?

Deliberate boringness. We stay close to framework conventions, avoid in-house abstractions that only we understand, keep the code and pipeline in your repository from day one, and document the upgrade path. Any competent team in that framework should be able to pick the project up. If you decide to move it in-house we run handover sessions and stay reachable while your engineers settle.

Deciding on a stack, or stuck on an old one?

Tell us what the application does and what you are running now. A senior engineer replies within one business day with a straight view on whether to build, upgrade or migrate — including when the answer is to leave it alone.

Book a free consultation Browse all services